About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-247430 1 (1992-07-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcag0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                                                                       4

          S   UmWd S.w. Gees


          Decision                                                   P9_


          Matter of:     Suddath Van Lines
          rile:          8-247430
          Date:          July 1, 1992


          A gaa   AAiM  case of carrier liability is not established
          where in 1988 a shipper provides no substantive evidence to
          support her allegation that $2,000 was paid in 1975 for a
          Karastan carpet lost by the carrier, which had been listed
          on the inventory as only rug, red, green.  The member must
          offer some substantive evidence that indicates the value of
          the lost item.
 * ~      DIISIOW

.        Suddath Van Lines requests review of our Claims Group's
          settlement denying its claim for a refund of $1,646.50,
          which the Air Force had set off for the loss of a rug during
          the shipment of a service member's household goods in
          September 1988.  We reverse the settlement.
          The lost rug was listed on the inventory as *rug, red,
          green.  The member claimed that she bought the rug in 1975,
          for $2,000.  She did not furnish a purchase receipt, but
          instead submitted evidence of the replacement value of a
          9' x 11' Karastan carpet: a retailer's 1988 estimate of
          $2,356.50.  The amount set off is the depreciated value.
          The Claims Group, in affirming the Air Force's set-off,
          pointed out that the carrier was responsible for accurately
          describing the item on the inventory, and that the member
          had no duty to annotate the inventory with a specific
          description or otherwise to specify that the rug had a high
          value.  The Claims Group determined that Suddath's failure
          to be more specific, on the inventory, about the rug's
          manufacturer or style--which appears to have been
          oriental--does  not establish that the claimed rug was not
          tendered to the carrier.  The Claims Group further noted
          that it would be unreasonable for the member to have kept a
          sales receipt for a rug bought 13 years earlier.






          1                 74069/


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most