About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405130 1 (2011-06-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbvj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   JlL

A     ,   GA       O                                                   Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548

              D  ..
          Decision


          Matter  of:  Technatomy  Corporation

          File:        B-405130

          Date:        June 14, 2011

          J. Cobbie De Graft, Esq., for the protester.
          John E. McCarthy, Esq., Sarah B. Gleich, Esq., and Howard H. Yuan, Esq., Crowell
          & Moring LLP, for Catapult Technology, Inc., an intervenor.
          Stephanie A. Kreis, Esq., Department of Defense, for the agency.
          Paul N. Wengert, Esq., Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Sharon L. Larkin, Esq.,
          James A. Spangenberg, Esq., and Daniel M. Reach, Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          The Government  Accountability Office (GAO) will not dismiss a protest concerning
          the issuance of a task order under the authority of Title 41 of the U.S. Code,
          notwithstanding the sunset of 41 U.S.C. § 4106(f) (2006 & Supp. IV 2010) (formerly
          codified at 41 U.S.C. § 253j(e) (2006 & Supp. III 2009)). The sunset provision
          eliminated both a pre-existing restriction on GAO's jurisdiction to hear protests
          concerning the issuance of task or delivery orders under multiple-award indefinite-
          delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts, and a temporary partial waiver of that
          restriction concerning task orders over $10 million. With the elimination of both the
          underlying restriction, and the partial waiver of that restriction, GAO's jurisdiction
          reverts to its original jurisdiction for its bid protest function--i.e., the jurisdiction set
          forth in the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984--under which GAO had
          jurisdiction to hear such protests.
          DECISION

          Technatomy  Corporation, of Fairfax, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to
          Catapult Technology, Inc., of Bethesda, Maryland, under solicitation No. EGO184.00,
          by the Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), for
          support of the U.S. Army Information Technology Agency. The order was issued
          under a multiple-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contract
          awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA). The protester argues that
          the agency unreasonably evaluated vendors' technical and cost quotations.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most