About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401503.4 1 (2010-08-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbnq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  L

        G     A   O                                                  Comptroller General
 ,c  c  ountabiity * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for pbi  ees
         Decision


         Matter of:  Imagine One Technology & Management,  Ltd.

         File:       B-401503.4

         Date:       August 13, 2010

         David J. Taylor, Esq., Katherine A. Allen, Esq., Rachel W. McGuane, Esq., and
         William J. Spriggs, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, for the protester.
         John R. Tolle, Esq., and Bryan R. King, Esq., Barton Baker Thomas & Tolle, LLP, for
         the intervenor.
         Stephanie J. Quade, Esq., and Raymond P. Oldach, Jr., Esq., Department of the Navy,
         for the agency.
         Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. In a task order competition where the agency conducted discussions, protest that
         the agency engaged in unequal and misleading discussions is denied where the
         record shows that discussions were appropriately tailored to the firms' respective
         proposals and were not misleading or unfair.

         2. Protest challenging the agency's cost realism analysis of the protester's proposed
         impacted indirect rates is denied, where the record demonstrates that the protester
         failed to substantiate its proposed rates and the agency reasonably relied on rates
         that had been approved by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

         3. Protest challenging the agency's technical evaluation of the protester's proposal is
         denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent
         with evaluation criteria; mere disagreement with agency's evaluation is insufficient
         to show it was unreasonable.
         DECISION

         Imagine One Technology & Management,  Ltd., of Colonial Beach, Virginia protests
         the issuance of a task order to Advanced Systems Technology & Management, Inc.
         (ASTM), of Vienna, Virginia, by the Department of the Navy, Naval Air Systems
         Command   under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00024-08-R-3353 for program
         management  support services. Imagine One challenges the agency's cost and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most