About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-402820 1 (2010-07-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbki0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   iL

          G     A   O                                                  Comptroller General
fuu 7in LAccountabiity * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548

              D   ..
          Decision


          Matter  of:  URS  Group, Inc.

          File:        B-402820

          Date:        July 30, 2010

          Daniel F. Edwards, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP, for the protester.
          Jeffrey M. Herrema, Esq., Environmental Protection Agency, for the agency.
          Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of the agency's rejection of the protester's proposal as technically
          unacceptable is denied, where the protester failed to establish that it possessed a top
          secret facility security clearance on the due date for receipt of proposals as required
          by the solicitation.
          DECISION

          URS  Group, Inc., of Washington, D.C., protests the rejection of its proposal
          submitted under request for proposals No. (RFP) No. PR-CI-09-10342, issued by the
          Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) for technical support services to assist EPA
          in its water-security related activities. The protester argues that the EPA improperly
          rejected its proposal for failing to demonstrate that it had a top secret clearance as
          required by the solicitation.

          We  deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The RFP, issued on February 22, 2010, contemplated the award of a cost-plus-fixed-
          fee contract to the firm whose proposal represented the best value to the
          government, price and other factors considered. RFP §§ L-4, M-1. The RFP advised
          offerors that the agency intended to evaluate offers and award a contract without
          discussions. RFP § L-1 (incorporating by reference Federal Acquisition Regulation
          (FAR)  § 52.212-1). As relevant here, the RFP contained the following security
          clearance requirement:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most