About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401173.3 1 (2010-05-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbhp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Freedom  Scientific, Inc.

          File:        B-401173.3

          Date:        May 4, 2010

          Claude P. Goddard Jr., Esq., Daniel J. Donohue, Esq., and Sarah M. Graves, Esq.,
          Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP, and David E. Hilliard, Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, for
          the protester.
          Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., Stuart W. Turner, Esq., and Maureen Jeffreys, Esq., Arnold &
          Porter LLP, for Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc., an intervenor.
          Maura C. Brown, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
          Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. General solicitation provisions mandating that the contractor comply with the
          requirements of federal, state, and local laws, codes and regulations do not require
          that an offeror demonstrate compliance prior to award; compliance with applicable
          federal, state or local requirements is a performance requirement that may be
          satisfied during contract performance.

          2. Protest challenging evaluation of awardee's proposal is denied where record
          shows that agency evaluated proposal in accordance with the solicitation criteria,
          and that its conclusions were reasonable.
          DECISION

          Freedom  Scientific, Inc., of St. Petersburg, Florida, protests the award of a contract
          to Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc., of Huntington Beach, California, under request for
          proposals (RFP) No. VA-797-08-RP-002, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs
          (VA) for closed-circuit electronic magnification devices (CCTVs) for use by
          visually-impaired veterans at VA medical centers. Freedom argues that the products
          offered by Enhanced do not meet the technical requirements of the solicitation and
          are not compliant with applicable Federal Communication Commission (FCC)
          regulations.


We  deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most