About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-402324 1 (2010-02-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbfh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   AlL

A     ,   GA       O                                                   Comptroller General
        Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548                                   DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                      The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.



          Matter  of:  Energy Systems Group

          File:        B-402324

          Date:        February 26, 2010

          W. Bruce Shirk, Esq., Jessica M. Madon, Esq., and Townsend L. Bourne, Esq.,
          Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, for the protester.
          Kenneth G. Wilson, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging potential offeror's exclusion from competition on the basis of an
          organizational conflict of interest (OCI) is denied where the agency reasonably
          concluded that the protester's preparation of a report that was used to prepare a
          statement of work for a competitive solicitation created a biased ground rules OCI.
          DECISION

          Energy Systems Group  (ESG), of Hampton Roads, Virginia, protests its exclusion
          from the competition under request for proposals (RFP) No. N40085-09--5083, issued
          by the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for energy
          conservation and efficiency design-build services at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia.
          ESG  contends that the Navy unreasonably concluded that the protester's preparation
          of a study that was used by the agency to develop the statement of work (SOW) for
          the RFP created a biased ground rules organization conflict of interest (OCI) that
          required its exclusion from the competition.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          As part of ongoing government-wide efforts to reduce energy consumption, the Navy
          sought to improve the energy efficiency of facilities at Naval Station Norfolk. The
          agency sought to obtain the energy efficiency services through a utility energy
          service contract (UESC). Under a UESC, an agency may enter into a sole-source
          contract with a utility company for services where energy cost savings are shared

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most