About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401735.3 1 (2010-02-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbev0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountabily - Integrity Reliability                            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548

            D   ..
         Decision


         Matter of:  Laducer & Associates, Inc.

         File:       B-401735.3

         Date:       February 23, 2010

         Wayne A. Keup, Esq., for the protester.
         David A. Ingold, Esq., Internal Revenue Service, for the agency.
         Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency's determination that it needed to provide all offerors with updated volume
         estimates, as well as to ensure that offerors properly understand the relative value of
         both proposing innovations and obtaining reliable, accurate, and timely results,
         constitutes a reasonable basis for reopening the competition.
         DECISION

         Laducer & Associates, Inc., of Mandan, North Dakota, protests the Internal Revenue
         Service's (IRS or agency) issuance of amendment No. 5 to request for quotations
         (RFQ) No. TIRNO-08-Q-00124 for the conversion of paper-based documents to digital
         format. The agency issued the RFQ amendment in response to a prior protest filed
         by another offeror, Mandaree Enterprise Corporation; that prior protest challenged
         the agency's award of a contract to Laducer. The RFQ amendment at issue makes
         various changes to the terms of the solicitation, and seeks revised proposals from
         the offerors.' Laducer maintains that the agency should be precluded from seeking
         revised proposals, and argues that the agency's actions should be limited to
         reevaluating the previously submitted proposals.



         1 Although the solicitation identified itself as an RFQ, the term proposal as
         opposed to quotation, appears repeatedly throughout the solicitation, and the
         solicitation contemplated an evaluation and source selection scheme similar to those
         used in negotiated procurements. For the sake of consistency, our decision adopts
         the terminology used by the solicitation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most