About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-402000 1 (2009-12-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbem0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Ii
   .L

 A       G     A   O                                                  Comptroller General
f. A    Accountabity * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
  Washington, DC 20548
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                        aprvdfor public release.
          Decision


          Matter  of:  Building Restoration Corporation

          File:        B-402000

          Date:        December  29, 2009

          Timothy  A. Sullivan, Esq., and Jason C. Tarasek, Esq., Best & Flanagan LLP, for the
          protester.
          Capt. Bridget E. Keenan, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency improperly evaluated protester's proposal as marginal, and thus
          ineligible for award under the terms of the solicitation, is denied where the record
          shows  that the agency reasonably concluded the proposal's deficiencies and
          weaknesses  warranted a technical rating of marginal, and thus properly made award
          to the lowest-priced, technically-acceptable offeror without conducting discussions.
          DECISION

          Building Restoration Corporation (BRC) of Roseville, Minnesota, protests the award
          of a contract to Hydro-Tech, Inc., of Lehi, Utah, under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. W91QF4-09-R-0020,  issued by the Department of the Army for repair of a tower
          at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. BRC contends that the Army's evaluation of its
          proposal was unreasonable.

          We  deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The RFP  was issued on July 14, 2009, and called for the award of a fixed-price
          contract. The RFP provided that award would be made, without discussions, to the
          lowest-priced, technically-acceptable offeror. RFP at 10. Under the technical
          evaluation factor, the RFP identified four subfactors: (1) prior experience with
          historic preservation construction projects; (2) technical excellence;
          (3) management  capability; and (4) personnel qualifications. Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most