About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-402280 1 (2010-01-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbdi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of:  LaBarge  Products, Inc.

          File:       B-402280

          Date:       January 19, 2010

          John M. Heida, Esq., for the protester.
          Debra Talley, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protester's challenge to the issuance of a delivery order valued under $10 million--
          and hence outside the jurisdiction of GAO's bid protest forum to hear protests
          involving task and delivery orders--is dismissed.

          2. Protester's contention that a delivery order was outside the scope of the
          underlying indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contract against which the
          order was issued--and hence is eligible for consideration under the statutory
          exemption to the bar on our jurisdiction available when a protester alleges that the
          order increased the scope, period, or maximum value of the ID/IQ contract under
          which the order is issued--is dismissed where the protester itself holds one of the
          underlying ID/IQ contracts; this exemption is not for aggrieved competitors for the
          issuance of the order, but for other entities, who, because they do not hold one of
          the underlying ID/IQ contracts, were not allowed to compete for what is, in essence,
          a new procurement which improperly circumvented the competition requirements of
          the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984.
          DECISION

          LaBarge Products, Inc., of Saint Louis, Missouri, protests the Department of the
          Army's issuance of a delivery order for fuel and water pump assemblies, valued at
          $2,411,342.40, to DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. LaBarge alleges that the pumps
          quoted by the winning vendor will not meet the specifications set forth in the
          delivery order, and contends that the agency impermissibly changed the scope of the
          underlying contract by allowing the awardee's pumps to be used with the Army's
          Assault Hoseline System--a system with which LaBarge claims only its pumps are
          compatible. Protest at 3-4.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most