About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401689,B-401689.2,B-401689.3 1 (2009-11-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbcd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   li
   AL

A     ,   G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
        Acc untabiity * Integrity * Reliability of the United States
 United States Governm ent A ccountability  Office    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Washington, DC 20548                                   DOCUMENT   FOR  PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                       The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Innovative Technologies Corporation

          File:        B-401689; B-401689.2; B-401689.3

          Date:        November  9, 2009

          Robert Guy Hanseman,  Esq., and James Alan Dyer, Esq., Sebaly, Shilliot + Dyer, for
          the protester.
          John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Gregory, Esq., and
          Andrew  J. Foti, Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, for Tybrin Corporation, an
          intervenor.
          Sharon A. Jenks, Esq., and Behn M. Kelly, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the
          agency.
          Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest of alleged improprieties apparent on face of task order solicitation, filed
          after issuance of the task order, is dismissed as untimely under GAO's Bid Protest
          Regulations.

          2. Protest that the agency unreasonably evaluated the competitors' proposals, based
          primarily on the agency's alleged failure to sufficiently credit the protester's
          incumbent  status and advantages, is denied where the record shows the agency
          evaluation was reasonable and in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria.

          3. Alleged misrepresentations by vendor that was issued the task order were not
          material where the agency did not rely upon them.

          4. Nature and extent of agency's price realism analysis, including proposed labor
          rates, of proposals responding to fixed-price task order solicitations are matters
          within the reasonable exercise of the agency's discretion
          DECISION

          Innovative Technologies Corporation (ITC) of Dayton, Ohio protests the issuance of
          task order No. 38 under the Department of the Air Force's Consolidated Acquisition
          of Professional Services (CAPS) multiple-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most