About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401694,B-401694.2 1 (2009-11-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbbv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:  G4S  Government  Services

          File:       B-401694; B-401694.2

          Date:       November   4, 2009

          Richard J. Webber, Esq., Lisa K. Miller, Esq., Kevin R. Pinkney, Esq., Craig S. King,
          Esq., and William W. Goodrich, Jr., Esq., Arent Fox LLP, for the protester.
          Richard J. Vacura, Esq., Keric B. Chin, Esq., and K. Alyse Latour, Esq., Morrison &
          Foerster LLP, and James J. McCullough, Esq., Steven A. Alerding., Esq., and William
          S. Speros, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, for BI Incorporated, an
          intervenor.
          Song U. Kim, Esq., Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of
          Homeland  Security, for the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of the realism of awardee's proposed
          price is denied where record shows agency conducted well-documented price
          evaluation that was consistent with solicitation requirements.

          2. Protest challenging evaluation of offerors' technical proposals and past
          performance is denied where the record shows that agency's evaluation was
          reasonable and supported by the record, or that there was no prejudice to the
          protester as a result of the alleged errors since, even if the offerors' ratings were
          adjusted as protester argues they should be, protester's proposal still would be rated
          no higher than the awardee's lower-priced proposal.
          DECISION

          G4S Government  Services, of Atlanta, Georgia, protests the award of a contract to BI
          Incorporated, of Boulder, Colorado, under request for proposals (RFP) No. HSCECR-
          09-R-00004, issued by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),
          Department of Homeland  Security (DHS), for the intensive supervision appearance
          program (ISAP II). G4S argues that the agency's evaluation of offerors' technical
          proposals and BI's price proposal was unreasonable.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most