About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401438 1 (2009-09-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbbr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                   Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office       DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  ESCO  Marine, Inc.

          File:        B-401438

          Date:        September  4, 2009

          Michael L. Sterling, Esq., Patrick A. Genzler, Esq., and Gretchen M. Baker, Esq.,
          Vandeventer  Black LLP, for the protester.
          Eric J. Marcotte, Esq., and Gregory R. Evans., Esq., Winston & Strawn LLP, for
          International Shipbreaking Limited LLC, an intervenor.
          D. S. Spiegelman-Boyd, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Where, in connection with task order for dismantling ships, offerors are required
          to sell the scrap resulting from the ship dismantling, are permitted to retain the scrap
          sale proceeds, and are required to offset their proposed prices by the scrap sale
          proceeds, the determination of whether the task order is valued in excess of
          $10 million--as part of a determination of GAO's jurisdiction to review a protest of
          the task order placed under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract--is not
          limited to consideration of offerors' proposed prices but properly includes
          consideration of estimated ship scrap values.

          2. Protest challenging the evaluation of technical proposals is denied where the
          record establishes that the agency's evaluation was reasonable, consistent with the
          stated evaluation criteria, and adequately documented.

          3. Affirmative determination of awardee's financial responsibility under task order
          for ship dismantling services was not reasonable where, notwithstanding the fact
          that the awardee's proposal expressly represented that it planned to tow and
          dismantle three ships simultaneously, the contracting officer nevertheless based his
          determination of adequate financial resources on the awardee incurring the towing
          and dismantling costs sequentially.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most