About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-400870.3 1 (2009-07-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadayx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute

          File:        B-400870.3

          Date:        July 15, 2009

          Paul E. Pompeo, Esq., Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., and Caitlin K. Cloonan, Esq., Arnold &
          Porter LLP, for the protester.
          Jonathan J. Frankel, Esq., Jay P. Urwitz, Esq., and Kelly Thompson Cochran, Esq.,
          Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, for the intervenor.
          Charles B. Wallace, Esq., and Sherry Kinlan Kaswell, Esq., Department of the
          Interior, for the agency.
          Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Post-award protest challenging agency's elimination of proposal for region-wide
          consortium approach that was filed more than 3 months after protester received
          notice of the proposal's elimination is not timely where protester received all of the
          information on which the protest is based at the time the proposal was eliminated;
          exception to timeliness rules based on receipt of a debriefing is inapplicable where
          protester chose to delay debriefing regarding the eliminated proposal until after
          award.

          2. Selection of higher-rated, higher-priced proposals is unobjectionable where the
          agency reasonably determined that various aspects of awardee's proposals, that
          established their technical superiority, outweighed the protester's price advantages.
          DECISION

          University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute (UMDI), of Hadley, Massachusetts,
          protests the actions of the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Business Center
          Acquisition Services Directorate (AQD), in connection with four contracts awarded
          to Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC), of Newton, Massachusetts, on behalf
          of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), to provide training and
          technical assistance services for HHS grantees in the states of Massachusetts,
          Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No.
          1406-04-08-RP-20771. UMDI asserts that the agency improperly rejected one of

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most