About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-311303.2 1 (2009-05-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaxg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: AlL A , G A O Comptroller General ,c c ountabiity * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. D e c is io n ........................................................... Matter of: JVSCC File: B-311303.2 Date: May 13, 2009 T. Wayne Gray, Esq., Joseph P. Hornyak, Esq., and Megan M. Mocho, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for the protester. William A. Roberts, III, Esq., Phillip J. Davis, Esq., Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., and Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for La Termica S.r.l., the intervenor. Amy M. Steed, Esq., Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for the agency. Christina Sklarew, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's technical proposal is denied, where the evaluation was consistent with the solicitation evaluation criteria. DECISION SEB. CO. Costruzioni S.a.s. / CO. PEL. S.a.s. / C.D.M. S.r.l., a Joint Venture, (JVSCC) protests the award of a contract to La Termica S.r.l. under request for proposals (RFP) No. N33191-07-R-1001, issued by the Department of the Navy for construction services in Italy. We deny the protest. The RFP provided for the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) construction contract for a base year with four 1-year options for the design, construction, alteration, repair and/or improvement of existing Navy facilities in southern Italy. Offerors were informed that award would be made on a best-value basis, considering the following five evaluation factors: organizational and team experience; organizational past performance; management approach; safety; and price. The RFP provided proposal preparation instructions for each of the evaluation factors and stated that the individual non-price factors were equal to each other in importance and, when combined, were approximately equal in importance to price. RFP amend. 1, at 32-33, 34-39. Offerors were also informed that technical proposals were limited to 20 pages in length, RFP amend. 1, at 30, but that the page

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most