About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-400552 1 (2008-11-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaqe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  I

         G    A     0Comptroller General
L LA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                     of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter  of: Asia Resource Partners K.K.

         File:        B-400552

         Date:        November 5, 2008

         Michael Hertz for the protester.
         Maj. LaChandra C. Richardson, Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
         Paul N. Wengert, Esq., Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the
         General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest arguing that agency acted improperly when it excluded offeror from
         competition for contracts at the base where the wife of the offeror's president serves
         as a contracting officer is denied because the agency decision was a reasonable
         attempt to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
         DECISION

         Asia Resource Partners K.K., of Tokyo, Japan, protests its exclusion from
         competition by the Department of the Air Force under request for proposals (RFP)
         No. FA5270-08-R-0015 for operation and maintenance of a liquid propane gas (LPG)
         distribution system, and RFP No. FA5270-08-R-0047 for fuel storage tank
         maintenance. The protester argues that the Air Force has improperly concluded that
         the firm's participation in these procurements creates an appearance of impropriety,
         and that excluding the firm from these competitions is unreasonable.

         We  deny the protest.

         This protest relates to two solicitations issued by the 18th Contracting Squadron,
         Kadena Air Base, Japan. It raises the question of whether a contracting agency may
         properly exclude from consideration proposals submitted by an offeror whose top
         executive is married to an agency procurement official within the same contracting
         organization, on the basis that an award to that offeror would create the appearance
         of impropriety. For the reasons explained below, we believe that the Federal
         Acquisition Regulation (FAR) authorizes the actions taken here, and that the Air
         Force reasonably exercised this authority.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most