About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-310442 1 (2007-12-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaff0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

         G     A    0Comptroller General
L MA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office        DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:  D&J Enterprises, Inc.

          File:       B-310442

          Date:       December  13, 2007

          John T. Flynn, Esq., Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLP, for the
          protester.
          Matthew R. Keiser, Esq., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
          Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's technical proposal and
          resulting exclusion from competitive range is denied where record shows agency
          reasonably downgraded proposal on basis that it failed to address, or inadequately
          addressed, material solicitation requirements.
          DECISION

          D&J Enterprises, Inc. protests the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive
          range under request for proposals (RFP) No. W912P8-07-R-0101, issued by the
          U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for debris management services. D&J argues that the
          Corps unreasonably evaluated its technical proposal, and that its proposal's
          elimination from the competitive range therefore was improper.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP provided for a best value evaluation based on price and four equally
          weighted technical factors: past performance; management/operations plan (with
          subfactors for organizational structure/key personnel, technical approach and
          methodology, geographic area management, safety-site specific safety and health
          plan, quality control plan, waste reduction/recycling strategy); small business
          subcontracting plan; and technical approach to sample task order (with subfactors
          for technical approach, production rate, use of local subcontractors, and activity
          hazard analysis). RFP § M, at 110.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most