About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

A79214 1 (1903-05-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadacu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


610         DECISIONS  OF THE  COMPTROLLER.


AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEYS OF THE JUDGMENT
  CREDITORS TO ENTER SATISFACTION OF THE
  JUDGMENT.
A judgment against the United States in favor of persons who were non-
    residents having expressly provided that payment thereof should be
    made to the attorneys of the judgment creditors, such attorneys are
    authorized upon receipt of the amount of the judgment to enter satis-
    faction thereof.
(Comptroller Traciewell to the Seeretary o)f the Treasury, kay
                         5, 1903.)

  By  your reference, under date of the 1st instant, of a com-
munication from  Mr. Robert  M. Hughes,  of Norfolk, Va.,
you  request my views as to who  may  enter satisfaction of
judgment  and receive payment in the case presented.
  The  judgment referred to was rendered.by the circuit court
for the eastern district of Virginia in a suit by James Graham,
jr., against the United States for salvage services rendered by
the steamer Birdostoald in rescuing the Winter Quarter light
vessel, to. 45, of the United States, which was -found adrift
in the open sea. The suit was brought by Graham, as agent of
the master and owners of the steamer, who were nonresidents.
  Judgment   was rendered in the names  of the master and
owners of the steamer for $1,500, but it was expressly pro-
vided by the decree that payment thereof should be made to
Charles  Sharp and Robert  M.  Hughes, as partners in the
practice of law under the name and style of Sharp & Hughes,
who  were counsel for the petitioners and who had asserted ar'
attorney's lien upon the amount of the award. It is a general
rule of practice that satisfaction of a judgment may be made
by  the attorney of record of the judgment  creditor while
his authority as attorney remains unrevoked, and in view of
the specific provision in the decree in this case, I can see no
reason to doubt that counsel named are authorized to make
such satisfaction and that payment  of the amount  of the
judgment  may be legally made to them.


PAYMENT OF RENT TO A LESSOR WHO IS THE
               AGENT   OF  THE   OWNER.

Sections 3477 and 3737, Revised Statutes, which prohibit the transfer or
   assignment of claims against, or contracts with, the United States,
   have no application to the payment of rent by the Government to a
   lessor who is the agent of the owner of the leased premises.
 (Comptroller Tracewell to the Public Printer, Hay 6, 1903.)

   I have received your letter of the 1st instant, as follows:
   This office entered into a lease with James C. Brown, of
 Baltimore, id., for a stable, to run from April 15, 1901, to
 April 14, 1902, since which time we have been occupying the
 stable without a-lease for the reason that we were never able
 to get Mr. Brown  to execute a new lease. I am now  pre-
 sented with a power of attorney, signed by James C. Brown,
 empowering  Thomas J. Fisher & Co., Incorporated, to collect
 rental due from the United States Government, and also to
 enter into a new lease with the United States Government for
 one year from April 15, 1902, to April 14, 1903.
   1 have to ask whether, in your opinion, I am authorized
 to execute this lease and to pay the rent to Thomas J. Fisher
 & Co., under this power of attorney, the lease, of course, to
 be subject to the approval of the Joint Committee on Print-
 ing, as the law provides.
   Sections 3477 and 3737 of the Revised Statutes forbid the
 transfer or. assignment of all manner of claims against or
 contracts with the United States, and hence all payments
 under the lease with Brown, the owner of the premises, must
 * be made to him and pot to his attorney or agent. There is
 no  objection, however, to your taking a receipt from his
 attorney as a proper voucher in your account with the Treas-
 ury, provided that payment is made by a check drawn on the
 Treasurer of the United States or a designated depository,
 payable to the order of the principal, in the manner prescribed
 in  the circular herewith inclosed (Department Circular, No.
 52, of April 29, 1903).
    As to the proposed. lease, it may be executed by Thomas J.
  Fisher & Co., Incorporated, as attorney in fact for James C.
  Brown,  under a properly executed  power of , attorney, in
  which case the rental due may be paid to said company.


+


PAYMENT   OF .RENT.             ;_ 611

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most