About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298164.2,B-298288 1 (2006-08-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaczon0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

         G    A     0Comptroller General
L LA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


             D   ..
          Decision


          Matter of:  Alfa Consult S.A.

          File:       B-298164.2; B-298288

          Date:       August 3, 2006

          Paul F. Khoury, Esq., and William J. Grimaldi, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, for
          the protester.
          Parag J. Rawal, Esq., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
          Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency's proposed corrective action--terminating protester's contract,
          amending solicitation and accepting revised offers--in response to protest from
          unsuccessful offeror is unnecessary and improper, is denied where agency
          reasonably concluded that solicitation was unclear regarding whether award would
          be based on best value or low cost/technical acceptability, and that this deficiency
          could have affected outcome of original competition.
          DECISION

          Alfa Consult S.A. protests the decision of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to take
          corrective action in response to a protest filed by ALMCO, Ltd. in connection with
          request for proposals (RFP) No. W917BG-06-R-0045 (RFP-0045).

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on January 21, 2006, contemplated the award of approximately
          three fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contracts to perform
          construction, renovation, and related projects in Iraq. The RFP included technical
          and price factors, and provided that awards would be made pursuant to Federal
          Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 15.101-2--which describes the process for awarding a
          contract on the basis of low cost/technical acceptability--to the offerors who present
          the best value considering technical acceptability, price, and risk. RFP at 12.
          However, the RFP also listed the relative importance of the technical factors and
          price, and provided for an adjectival rating of proposals under the technical factors,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most