About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-296861 1 (2005-09-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaczhr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

         G    A     0Comptroller General
L MA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:  EDO  Corporation

          File:       B-296861

          Date:       September 28, 2005

          Jeffrey P. Bialos, Esq., Christer L. Mossberg, Esq., John M. Wingate, Esq., and
          Bradley E. Prendergast, Esq., Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan LLP, for the protester.
          Maj. Lawrence Anderson, Maj. Christina M. Slicker, and Bridget E. Lyons, Esq.
          Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
          Mark D. Colley, Esq., and Kara L. Daniels, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for Raytheon
          Company, an intervenor.
          Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Cost realism evaluation of protester's proposal was unobjectionable where record
          shows that upward cost adjustments were based on evaluators' reasonable
          assessments that proposal significantly understated labor hours needed to perform.

          2. Agency's identification of risk associated with protester's very low fixed
          production price is not relevant to award decision where selection authority did not
          cite the identified risk in making award decision.

          3. Agency reasonably evaluated protester's proposal as high risk, despite protester's
          experience, due to proposal's failure to include sufficient support for low proposed
          labor hours.
          DECISION

          EDO Corporation's EDO MTech, Inc. (EDO) protests the award of a contract to
          Raytheon Company  under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8626-04-R-2067, issued
          by the Department of the Air Force for development of the Smart Triple Ejector
          Rack (TER) bomb rack unit. EDO challenges the agency's cost realism evaluation of
          EDO's proposal and the resulting award to Raytheon.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most