About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294335 1 (2004-09-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyup0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Il
   im

         G    A     0Comptroller General
 ..  ..Accountability * Integrity Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


             D  ..
         Decision


         Matter  of:  Government Contracts Consultants

         File:       B-294335

         Date:        September 22, 2004

         James D. Bailey for the protester.
         Maj. Jennifer S. Zucker, Department of the Army, for the agency.
         Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
         General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protester's contention that awardee's price is too low to have been based on an
         adequate staffing level does not raise serious concerns that contracting officer
         ignored relevant information in finding awardee responsible so as to trigger GAO
         review of contracting officer's affirmative responsibility determination.
         DECISION

         Government  Contracts Consultants (GCC) protests the Department of the Army's
         selection of Ultima Services Corporation under request for quotations (RFQ) No.
         W911RX-04-T-0100, for postal services at Fort Riley, Kansas. The protester contends
         that Ultima's price is unreasonably low and that the awardee lacks relevant
         experience.

         We  deny the protest.

         The RFQ  requested prices for a base and 3 option years and contemplated the award
         of a fixed-price contract. In section M, the RFQ provided both for award to the
         lowest-priced responsible vendor, and for award to the responsible vendor
         submitting the quotation evaluated as most advantageous to the Government, price
         and past performance (which were of equal weight) considered.


         1 We note that while the solicitation was styled a request for quotations, in various
         places it uses terms associated with a request for proposals, and specifically
         provides for award of a contract to the successful firm. See RFP § L at 58; § M at 60.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most