About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-289513.3 1 (2004-03-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyqy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Il
   im

         G     A    0Comptroller General
 ... .Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States General Accounting Office               DOCUMENT  FOR  PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:  Dismas Charities, Inc.

          File:       B-289513.3

          Date:       March 26, 2004

          Alex D. Tomaszczuk, Esq., and Daniel S. Herzfeld, Esq., Shaw Pittman, for the
          protester.
          Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., Esq., and Kevin M. Cox, Esq., for Bannum, Inc., an
          intervenor.
          Christopher J. Van Home, Esq., Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons,
          for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of agency's evaluation of proposals and source selection is denied where
          evaluation and award decision were reasonable and consistent with solicitation's
          evaluation terms.
          DECISION

          Dismas Charities, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Bannum, Inc. under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. 200-0665-SE, issued by the Department of Justice,
          Federal Bureau of Prisons, for Community Corrections Center services for federal
          offenders in Tupelo, Mississippi. Dismas generally challenges the agency's
          determination that the Dismas and Bannum proposals were substantially technically
          equal. Dismas argues that notwithstanding its higher price, it should have been
          selected for award based on its proposal's slightly higher evaluation point score.'

          We deny the protest.




          1 This protest relates to a re-evaluation of proposals conducted as corrective action
          in response to an earlier protest filed by Dismas against the agency's initial award to
          Bannum  under the RFP.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most