About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-292944,B-292944.2,B-292944.3 1 (2003-12-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacynq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

          G    A     0                                                 Comptroller General
........ Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Kilgore Flares Company

          File:        B-292944; B-292944.2; B-292944.3

          Date:        December  24, 2003

          Michael B. Hubbard, Esq., Joseph J. Dyer, Esq., and Robert F. Pezzimenti, Esq.,
          Seyfarth Shaw, for the protester.
          Ronald K. Henry, Esq., Kaye Scholer, for FR Countermeasures, Inc.; and Richard W.
          Oehler, Esq., and Eric A. Aaserud, Esq., Perkins Coie, for Armtec Defense Products
          Company,  intervenors.
          Rick Martinelli, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Contention that agency wrongly rejected protester's offer after determining that the
          protester was nonresponsible is denied where the record shows that the agency
          reasonably concluded that protester had not clearly established that it could meet
          the solicitation's delivery schedule.
          DECISION

          Kilgore Flares Company protests the determination that it is not a responsible
          offeror, and the resulting rejection of its lowest-priced offer, by the Department of
          the Navy under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00104-03-R-K054, issued to procure
          two types of flare decoys--known as MJU-38B and MJU-32B flares (hereinafter, the
          38B and 32B flares)--for use as countermeasures for aircraft under attack by heat-
          seeking missiles. In finding that Kilgore is not a responsible offeror, the Navy
          concluded, primarily, that Kilgore could not meet the delivery schedules here;
          Kilgore argues that the agency's determination lacks a reasonable basis.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The manufacture of flare decoys involves assembling highly explosive and unstable
          materials. Many of the firms that build these flares have experienced catastrophic
          explosions resulting in plant shutdowns, missed deliveries and sometimes, loss of

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most