About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-291820.2,B-291913 1 (2003-04-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyhf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

          G    A    0Comptroller General
A-      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                    of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of:  Paragon Van Lines, Inc.

          File:       B-291820.2; B-291913

          Date:       April 8, 2003

          Michael D. Cocozza for the protester.
          Maj. Art J. Coulter, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency had compelling reason to cancel an invitation for bids containing
          inconsistent provisions regarding the performance period and outdated Service
          Contract Act wage determinations.
          DECISION

          Paragon Van Lines, Inc. protests the cancellation after bid opening of invitation for
          bids (IFB) No. DAKF29-02-B-0001 and the issuance of request for quotations (RFQ)
          No. DABJ15-03-T-0074 by the Department of the Army for inbound and outbound
          transportation of household goods.

          We deny the protests.

          The IFB, issued January 17, 2002, provided for multiple awards of requirements
          contracts for packing, crating, moving and storage of household goods. The IFB bid
          schedule stated that the services were to be performed during the period 1 February
          2002, or date of subsequent award if subsequent thereto, through 31 January 2003.
          IFB § B, Bid Schedule, at 3. The IFB also stated that the period of performance for
          any contract awarded shall be twelve (12) months from effective date, IFB § F,
          Period of Contract Clause, at 7, and that services to be provided under the contract
          would be ordered by issuance of task orders which may be issued from twelve
          months from date of issuance of contract. IFB § I, Ordering Clause, at 14. The IFB
          incorporated by reference the contract clause at Federal Acquisition Regulation
          (FAR) § 52.222-41, Service Contract Act of 1965, as Amended, and included various
          wage determinations for the areas to be serviced by the contract.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most