About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-291482 1 (2003-01-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyed0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

          G    A     0Comptroller General
A-      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States General Accounting Office           DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  The Austin Company

          File:        B-291482

          Date:        January 7, 2003

          Keith L. Baker, Esq., Barton, Baker, McMahon & Tolle, for the protester.
          Edward  H. Kim, Esq., Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, for Poole & Kent
          Company/Gaudreau,  Inc. Joint Venture, an intervenor.
          J.J. Cox, Esq., and Madeline Shay, Esq., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the
          agency.
          Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          In procurement for the design and construction of a laboratory to conduct research
          of toxic chemical warfare agents, agency properly excluded protester's proposal
          from the competitive range where protester's proposal was reasonably evaluated as
          requiring a virtual rewrite due to its failure to comply with the solicitation
          requirements under each of four evaluation factors.
          DECISION

          The Austin Company  protests the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' elimination of
          Austin's proposal from the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. DACA31-02-R-0013 to design and construct an advanced chemistry laboratory
          (ACL) at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Austin protests that exclusion of its
          proposal was based on the agency's unreasonable application of the solicitation's
          stated evaluation factors.

          We  deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          On  December 19, 2001, the agency issued RFP No. DACA31-02-R-0013, seeking
          proposals for the design and construction of an ACL research facility, advising
          offerors that the facility would be dedicated to the study of super-toxic chemical
          warfare agents, lethal industrial materials, related weapons of mass destruction, and
          defensive counter-measures. Agency Report, exh. 1, RFP at 5. Due to the facility's

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most