About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290971,B-290971.2,B-290971.4,B-290971.5 1 (2002-10-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacybt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Il
   im

         G     A    0Comptroller General
---  --Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States General Accounting Office              DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:  Science Applications International Corporation

          File:       B-290971, B-290971.2, B-290971.4, B-290971.5

          Date:       October 16, 2002

          James J. McCullough, Esq., Deneen J. Melander, Esq., Steven A. Alerding, Esq., and
          Abram J. Pafford, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, and Lawrence J.
          Ruggiero, Esq., Science Applications International Corporation, for the protester.
          Thomas P. Barletta, Esq., Daniel C. Sauls, Esq., Robert A. Bailey, Esq., and Paul R.
          Hurst, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson, for Veridian Engineering, Inc., an intervenor.
          Joseph Boggs, Esq., Naval Air Warfare Center, for the agency.
          Tania Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest that contracting agency's evaluation of management and technical
          proposals was unreasonable is denied where the record shows that the evaluation
          was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria; disagreement with
          an agency's evaluation does not render it unreasonable.

          2. Protest that contracting agency improperly rejected and adjusted upward
          protester's proposed direct labor rates and its proposed escalation rate is denied
          where the record shows that the agency's methodology and rationale for both its
          rejection of the proposed rates and its upward adjustments are reasonable under the
          circumstances.
          DECISION

          Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) protests the award of a
          contract to Veridian Engineering, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. N68936-
          01-R-0079, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons
          Division (NAWCWD), to obtain scientific, technical, administrative, and research,
          development, test, and evaluation services. SAIC argues that the Navy improperly
          evaluated management, technical, and cost proposals and conducted an improper
          cost/technical tradeoff analysis.


We deny the protests.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most