About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

093554 1 (1974-02-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacxfq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


    2            UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                       WASHINGTON   REGIONAL OFFICE
ou~                             FIFTH FLOOR
                            803 WEST BROAD STREET
                         FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22046                   q3


                                                        FEB  1 5 1974
Mr. John L. Burke
Vice-President Fiscal Management
Government National Mortgage Association
Department of Housing and Urban Development                   lllIliI
                                                                LMO93554
Dear Mr. Burke:

     As you know, wke place considerable reliance on the work the Federal
National Mortgage Association's  (FNMA) internal auditors perform at FNMA
Regional Offices when we make our annual  audit of the Government National
Mortgage Association  (GNMA). During our  1973 audit we observed and tested
the work of the internal auditors  at FNMA's Chicago Regional Office.

     Our observations of the work performed  in Chicago indicated certain
aspects of the internal audit coverage  can be improved. The  audit program
itself needs to be reexamined and brought up-to-date with  current practices.
Furthermore, FNMA may wish to examine into  the validity of the comment of
the FNMA auditor-in-charge of the review  in Chicago that insufficient time
was allowed by his Headquarters for a  satisfactory performance of the audit
work programmed.  In this connection FNMA may wish  to require its auditors
to obtain written consent from Washington when  they wish to deviate signifi-
cantly from the program, as for example,  in the number of transactions to
be examined.  In accordance with our discussionA we  are sending you and
FNMA our specific comments as an enclosure, keyed  to a copy, also enclosed,
of the program used by FNMA's auditors  in Chicago.

     The appropriateness of the confirmation methodology was  another matter
of concern to us.  In  1972 less than 50 percent of the multifamily mortgages
selected responded to confirmation requests.  These unconfirmed  accounts were
not further reviewed by the FNMA auditors nor were  other steps taken to
establish their validity.   Further, this year's audit contained no selection
of accounts for confirmation that were unconfirmed  the previous year.  We
are aware that FNMA experienced major  changes in its internal audit organi-
zation at about the time  a followup to the prior year's confirmations would
normally have been made.  Nevertheless, we  believe that it is important that
confirmations should have been  sent this year to mortgagors who had not
responded  last year or FNMA should have reviewed the accounts for other.
evidence of validity at  the start of this year's review.  Because of the
significance of this  step we expanded our work and were able to satisfy our-
selves on this point.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most