About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

093243 1 (1972-11-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacxcg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



             UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                         REGIONAL  OFFICE
otR ROOM 403. U.S. CUSTOM.HOUSE,   610 SOUTH CANAL STREET
                       CICAGO, ILLINois 60607


                                                               NOV1    1972





 Commander
 U. S. Army Munitions Command
 Joliet, Illinois 60436

 Dear Sir:

      We recently completed a limited survey to determine whether
 the U. S. Army Munitions Command (MUCOM) provided contractors with
 funds for the acquisition of industrial plant equipment through
 negotiated supply contracts.  Our survey included a limited review
 of selected negotiated contracts awarded by MUCOM during fiscal
 year 1972 and discussions with responsible procurement officials.

      We identified two letter contracts, awarded to Marathon
 Le Tourneau and Avco Corporation for production of bomb bodies and
 booster adapters (see appendix), where the respective contractors'
 proposed contract prices, totaling about $7.4 million, included
 estimated costs of about $1.5 million for acquisition of plant
 equipment and reactivation of Government-owned production facilities.
 Estimated add-ons for General and Administrative Expense (G&A) and
 profit applicable to these costs are shown in the appendix.

     At  the time of our survey, the letter contracts awarded to
Marathon  Le Tourneau and Avco Corporation were scheduled for
definitization  in November 1972. The  contractors' plants are
commercially  owned; however, the plant equipment for production of
the bomb bodies  and booster adapters is Government-owned.  In this
regard,  a basic facilities contract is in effect on a no-fee basis
with Avco.  We were  told that a facilities contract was in process
of  award to Marathon Le Tourneau relative to the existing
Government-owned  production facilities at the plant.

     We believe  that the cost of the production equipment, and
 reactivation work included in the proposals for definitizing con-
 tracts DAAAO9-72-C-0330 and -0339 should be excluded from the
 production contracts. By using no-fee  facilities contracts for
 this effort, cost savings will accrue to the Government to the ex-
 tent of the contractors' profit on the proposed equipment costs.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most