About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

093153 1 (1974-08-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacxah0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
A-

                      UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOjiUTING OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


GENERAL GOVERNMENT
     DIVISION
                                                    August 27, 1974       V   1 3


                                                                      LMO93153
         Graham Watt, Director
         Office of Revenue Sharing
         Department of the Treasury        BEST  D&C      N   bvAILABLE

         Dear     4istr7

              In the course of our continuing review of the operations of the
         Office of Revenue Sharing, we examined into the treatment of revenue
         sharing funds which have been waived by Indian Tribes and Alaskan
         Native Villages.

              Section 108(b)(6)(D)(ii) of the Revenue Sharing Act provides that
         funds waived by a unit of local government are to be added to the
         entitlement of the county government of the county area in which the
         waiving unit is located.  Waivers by Indian Tribes and Alaskan Native
         Villages, however, are to be treated differently.  Section 108(b)(4),
         in effect, requires that funds waived by a tribe or village be distri-
         buted according to the allocation formula to all other governments
         within the county area.

              Our examination revealed that funds waived by tribes and villages
         have been erroneously transferred to a county or State government.  For
         example, the Office of Revenue Sharing publication 5th Entitlement
         Period Allocations with Prior Period Adjustments  showed that the
         Tuscarora Nation located in Niagara County, New York, waived its
         4th entitlement period amount of $17,407.  This amount was added to
         the allocation of the Niagara County government, thereby depriving
         other local governments in the county area of funds to which they were
         legally entitled.

              This matter has been discussed with your staff, and it is our
         understanding that the problem centers around the computer allocation
         program which was written to allocate waived funds to a higher level of
         government.  Apparently, the program was not set up to treat waivers
         of Indian Tribes and Alaskan Native Villages differently from waivers
         of other local governments.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most