About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

092458 1 (1972-01-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacwjp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                      UNI1ED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING FiFICE
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


CIVIL DIVISION




         Dear.Mr. Villarreal:

              We have reviewed  the1Urban Mass Transportation Administration's
        .U4BO   Service Development Program   This  program is made up of a
        heries  of Federal grants  to finance projects for developing new bus
        service  between  low-income Areas and potential employment locations
        which  were considered  inacccssible or inconvenient by public trans-
        portation.   The grants were made under  section 6(a) of the Urban Mass
        Transportatior  Act of  1964, as amended, which authorizes urban mass
        transportation  research, development  and demonstration projects.
        Through  June 30,  1971, 22 program grants totaling about $14.7 million
        were  made, usually  to provide 90 percent of estimated project costs.

              The first service development  project was funded in Los Angeles,
         California in May  1966. The  primary purpose of the project was to
         test whether improved public  transportation would sigpificantly
         increase job opportunities for  the disadvantaged inner-city poor.
         Ten new bus routes were initiated at various  times during the term
         of the project which ended  in July 1971.  Most of the new routes
         operated on regular schedules over fixed  routings to serve the gon-
         eral public living both in and out of  low-income areas.  The routes
         provided transportation to employment,  shopping, medical and recrea-
         tional centers.  The other routes operated  flexibly within the low-
         income areas on schedules designed  to meet different work shift
         needs of employees.  This service was available  only to residents of
         Lhe low-income areas.  Four of  the regularly-scheduled routes devel-
         oped sufficient patronage  to be continued after the development period.
         The remaining routes were discontinued because  of lack of patrcnage.

           .  Most other projects approved between  1966 and 1971 were similar
         in nature to the Los Angeles  project and were directrd primarily
         Loward increasing employment opportunities  for the inner-city poor.
         Usually, the service was provided by  local transit operators using
         normal bus operation, equipment, and  personnel.  For example, a project
         was funded in St. Louis, Missouri for regularly-scheduled  bus service
         between the city's low income area and an outlying  industrial complex.
         The service was provided by the local bus  company using regular transit
         equipment and included 15 weekday  trips from the city to the industrial
         area and 13 return trips.  Weekend service was  substantially less.  We

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most