About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

092113 1 (1970-01-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacwee0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

     -- ST7j

                      UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548
                                                                    JAN  30  1970
CIVIL. DIVISION

                                                           LM092113


         Dear Mr. Smith:

              The General Accounting Office has reviewed the manner in which
         the Farmers Home Administration (FHA) measured the progress made by
         borrowers in raising and maintaining  their income and living stand-
         ards as a result of receiving financial assistance under  the Eco-
         nomic Opportunity (EO) Loan Program.  Our review involved primarily
         an examination of the 1969 study made by FHA in measuring the
         progress of EO loan borrowers.  The  results of the FHA study were
         released to the public in a Department of Agriculture  press release
         dated July 22, 1969.  Our review was made pursuant to  the Budget
         and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. 53), and  the Accounting and
         Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 67).

              Our review was made primarily because of a distinct  difference
         in conclusions between the Department's press  release (see appendix)
         and our report to the Congress (B-130515, August  21, 1969), both of
         which were concerned with the impact of  the EO Loan Program on
         individual EO loan borrowers.  The press  release indicated that, on
         the average, EO loan borrowers had made substantial gains as a  result
         of the EO Loan Program.  Our report to  the Congress, however, pointed
         out that, on the basis of our findings and those  of the Economic
         Research Service, only minimal gains could be attributed  to the EO
         Loan Program.

              On the basis of our review of  the 1969 study, we concluded that
         FHA did not properly evaluate the impact of  the EO Loan Program
         because, in measuring the progress made by EO borrowers,  FHA recog-
         nized not only income obtained from  the loan enterprise but also
         income obtained from other sources.  We believe  that the gains, which
         FHA reported as being attributable  to the EO Loan Program, were over-
         stated as a result of including  the income from all sources.

              The FHA 1969 study covered  2,977 borrowers in 50 States and
         Puerto Rico who had been in the EO Loan Program up  to 3 years. The
         results of this study showed that borrowers  in the program for 3
         years at December 31, 1968, had greater  family income gains than

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most