About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

089546 1 (1976-06-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacvoq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                      -        WASHINGTON,  D C  20548


GENERAL GOVERNMENT
     DIVISION                                             JUN 17 1976



     Mr. Leonard F. Chapman, Jr.
     Commissioner, Immigration and
     Naturalization   Service
     Department of Justice

     Dear Mr. Chapman.

        We have  completed a limited  eview of the Immigration and Naturalization
     Service's (INS) alien removal Jograml   Our review included an examination
     of the practices and procedures for detaining and transporting deportable
     aliens by INS' Southwest regional office. We reviewed  the legislation and
     INS policies concerning the removal of aliens. We  examined pertinent records
     and interviewed officials at the INS Southwest regional office, San Pedro,
     California, INS district offices in Los Angeles, California, and Chicago,
     Illinois, and INS central office, Washington, D.C.

         Our review showed that INS lacks basic data to comprehensively evaluate
     the effectiveness of its alien removal program. More  specifically

         --INS has not made a comprehensive evaluation of its Mexican
           interior repatriation program. Available  evidence indicates
           the program is questionable.

         --Efforts to assess alien busing operations has been limited.
           Consequently, INS has no assurance its buses are effectively
           used, the purchase of new buses are justified, or chartered
           buses are an economical alternative.

        Additionally,  the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252(b))
    needs  to be clarified with respect to the payment of alien transportation
    costs.

    INTERIOR REPATRIATION  PROGRAM

         In fiscal year 1976 INS was authorized $2 million for its program
    of returning Mexican  aliens to the interior of Mexico (commonly referred
    to  as the interior repatriation program) as opposed to border towns. INS'
    justification  for the program was that this program is more of a deterrent
    because  it makes it more difficult for an alien to return to the United
    States.   In its fiscal year 1977 budget, INS requested $3.9 million for
    interior repatriation.





                           %7                V5Y6

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most