About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

089318 1 (1971-05-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacvgm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                      UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                                  REGIONAL  OFFICE
     ou                   143 PEDERAL OPPICE BUILDING. 50 PULTON STREET
                            SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102

IN REPLY REFER TO:

  84825                                                        MAY  I



          Commanding General                                  Ij|I||| ||||jI |||lI j|||
          Headquarters, U. S. Army Training  Center,          lu      llI      l
             Infantry and Fort Ord                                  LM091
          Fort Ord, California  93941

          Dear Sir:

               We have made a review of the civilian pay and related matters
          at the U. S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Ord.  This
          review, completed in April 1971, was made pursuant to the Budget
          and Accounting Act, 1921  (31 U.S.C. 53), and the Accounting and
          Auditing Act of 1950  (31 U.S.C. 67).

               Our review consisted of an examination of the policies,
          procedures and practices for the administration of  civilian pay
          at Fort Ord and a limited test of transactions.  Special emphasis
          was placed on the following areas:   (1) Internal Control, (2)
          Internal Review,  (3) Within-grade Increases, (4) Salary Act of
          1970, (5) Coordinated Federal Wage System, and  (6) Severance Pay.

               While we found that the procedures, practices and internal
          controls were adequate, we noted a number of minor discrepancies
          which indicated that the independent review functions within the
          Civilian Personnel and the Civilian Payroll Offices were not
          effective in specific instances as illustrated below:

               1.  One former Fort Ord employee was underpaid about $7,
                   because the Civilian Personnel Office used the wrong
                   salary rate to compute the severance pay fund.

               2.  Five former Fort Ord employees received the final sever-
                   ance payment (remaining balance) at the beginning rather
                   than the end of the severance pay period, because the
                   Civilian Payroll misinterpretated the remarks on the
                   separating personnel action.  Errors, involving both
                   overpayments and underpayments, in the pay of four of
                   the five employees totaled about $253, because they
                   were re-employed by the Federal government prior to ex-
                   bausting their severance pay benefits.






                           50TH  ANNIVERSARY   1921- 1971 12

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most