About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193410 1 (1978-12-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacuom0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                    UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548

                                                 IuN RPY B-193410
  OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL                      REFER TO:

f'6fvjes   AF~c~,y  ~otaer~           .S          t   December '26,71978
      Mr. Thomas P. Campbell
      Chief, Financial Management Division
      Federal Communications Commission      DLGoof3
      1919 M Street, NW  - Room 848
      Washington, D.C.  20554

      Dear Mr. Campbell:

           We appreciated the opportunity'to meet last Wednesday
      with you and other members of the Commission staff concerning
      the Commission's proposed refund procedures for excess license
      fee collections. The following summarizes briefly the points
      addressed and our understanding of the resolutions reached
      at our meeting.

           First, we expressed our concern over the Commission's
      original proposal that refund requests which it does not
      receive within one year could be submitted to the General
      Accounting Office as claims.  We view the refund procedure,
      which stems directly from judicial decisions instructing the
      Commission to recalculate 1970-1976 fees and to make appro-
      priate refunds, as essentially a matter between the courts
      and the Commission. It was not envisioned to operate as a
      claims procedure subject to our settlement functions under
      31 U.S.C. §71. */

           Submission of refund requests to GAO as claims` is
      also wholly impracticable.  As we explained, our Claims
      Division would have to refer back to the Commission each
      request for a factual and legal analysis.  In other words,
      the Commission would still have to go through the same pro-
      cess as it does in handling the requests directly. Thus the
      end result of the proposal would be to merely compound the
      administrative burden and cost to the Government, as well as
      making it more difficult for licensees to get their refunds.





      w/ See in this regard, National Ass'n of Broadcasters v.
         Federal Communications Commission, 554 F.2d 1118, 1122 at
         fn. 3 (D.C. Cir. 1976).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most