About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-188413 1 (1979-01-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacuok0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE            J
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


                                                        REFE T B-188413
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL






                                                                  JN4  1979
    The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
    The Attorney General

    Dear Mr. Attorney General:

         By letter of July 7, 1978, copy enclosed, we reported to you a claim
    due and asserted against Mr. John Morgerson in the amount of $2,357.64.
    The report was made at the request of Mr. Morgerson's attorney pursuant
    to 5 U.S.C. § 5512 b)(1976) so that suit could be instituted against
    Mr. Morgerson to adjudicate the matter in the appropriate United States
    District Court.

         Briefly stated, Mr. Morgerson was employed as a Special Messenger by
    the Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital in Lexington, Kentucky.  On    L
    January 7, 1976, Mr. Morgerson was making a series of deliveries, including
    a locked money pouch containing $2,357.64 he had picked up from the cashier's
    office at the VA Hospital.  When he arrived at his designation, he dis-
    covered the pouch missing from the  r  k of the Government vehicle he was    1
    driving.  A  equest for relief of &      ge     for the Joss of th  money   -
    pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 82a-1 was denied by our Office (B-188413, June 30,
    1977, copy enclosed).  In January, 1978, the VA began to deduct $46 per
    bi-weekly pay period from Mr. Morgerson's paycheck pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
    § 5512(a), to continue until the entire amount of the loss was repaid.

         On January 30, 1978, Mr. Morgerson filed suit in the United States
    District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, to enjoin the VA from making
    the deductions.  John Morgerson v. J.C. Abbottet al., Civ. No. 78-21.  On
    May 3, 1978, the defendant moved for dismissal or summgry judgment, arguing
    that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy by requirthg the United States to
    sue under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5512(b).  By letter dated May 22,
    1978  (your reference BAB:MFEvens:bfk, 145-3-1932), we were advised by
    Assistant Attorney General Barbara Allen Babcock that an Agreed Order of
 *  Dismissal had been entered on May 4, apparently as a result of the Govern-
    ment's motion.  Presumably in consequence of this action, the plaintiff
    requested that we make the statutory report.


003074

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most