About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193077 1 (1979-01-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacubs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: .5


United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548


  Office of
  General Counsel
'l  Reply
   eferto: -193077


>&


     The specific  question of whiether grant payments may be adjusted
retron-ctively as a result of a cliange In thie methiod thie grantee uses
to compute depreciation  on equipinellt used In performing a grant hias nor.


           /7kU773OCTWVC        $   Lk STV\ EriT      0*



        -4,-G


     9

I
/





        I..


Mr, Cordon L,  Hardina, Administrator                     :i21
Department of General  Services
Central Data Processing,  Blasdel Building
Capitol Complex                                               o1
Carson City, Nevada   89710

Dear Mr. flardings                   9)? /M c t.   jte(5       rta~        t

     This  refers to your letter to Dr. Carl Palmer  of the Financial and
General Management  Studies Division of this Office  about an accounting
problerl which exists in the-State of Nevada,  as  a result of th0 State
having undercharged  ijsers for depreciation on a Svate-owned comphter.
While it is  not at all clear from your letter,  it appears that the
retroactive  adjustmenws you seek are reimbursemenmt made  by Federal
agencies to  State agencies as grantees rather than  payments by Federal
agencies to  State agenqies under contracts for services.   We also
assume that your  Departmient is representing these State agencies in this
matter,  Although  the grant vs.contract distinction  is not determinative
of whether you are  legally entitled to any retroactive  adjustmelit (see
discus lon Uelow),  Government agencies are somewhat more  reaicted   in
theirbility    o wake  retroactive adjustments under contracts   in the
absencet-of any legal right entitlink the State1-Co addtional  payments.
This is because  no officer of the Government has  authority to give away
or surrender  a vested right or to modify the tervw  of a contract by a
supplemental  or substitute agreement, if such action  is prejudicial to
the interest of  the United States.  However,  there is somewhat more
flexibility  in the case of grants.  Specifically, you  asked about the
reasonableness  of recovering the amount of the undercharge  for prior
fiscal years  from users totally or partially financed  by Federal funds.

     Since we  are unaware of the laws under which  the users were fuilded
by the Federal Government  and do not have copies  of the grants or other
documents  involved, any comment we can make is neessarily   speculative
and should not  be construed as a decision on  the propriety of any possible
retroactive  payments.  The following discussion  is m'erely for informational
purposes.


'V


F


I .


.5 ®r

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most