About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-195246 1 (1979-08-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobactzj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: A   I    1i6b.       Ik6i


United States Gennral Accounting Office                     Office 9f
Washington, DC 20548                                        Genera'l Counsel
                                                            In Replj
                                                            Referto; B-195246

  Mr. Edmund J., Wiar, Jr.          !A aL  mkQ  3vaitable to pubito re
  National Wear.her Service, Eastern Region
  National Ocegnic and Atmospheric                         August .3, 1979
    Administratton
  Department of Commerce
  585 Stewart Avenue
  Garden City, New York  11530

  Dear Mr. Wiatr;

       This is in response to your question about whether State sales
  taxes or late payment charges on utility bills may be paid by a Federal
  agency.

       The general rule is, of course, that the Federal Government in  Am-
  mune from payment of State taxes.  However, in Alabama v. King and
  Boozer, 314 U.S. 1 (1941), the United States Supreme Court held that
  the Federal Government is not constitutionally immune from bearing  the
  financial burden of a State tax as long as the legal incidence of  the
  tax is not laid directly upon the Federal Government.  See United
  States v. Mississippi Tax Commission, 421 U.S, 599 (1979); United
  States v. County of Fresno, 429 U.S. 452 (1977).

       The determination of where the incidence falls--i.e., which party
  is legally responsible for the payment of the tax, is a matter of
  statutory construction.  For example, in 55 Comp. Gen. 1358 (1976) our
  Office discussed the legal incidence of the gasoline taxes of several
  States.  In that opinion, our decision on whether the Federal Government
  should pay the tax charged when it purchased gasoline in those Staves
  turned upon whether the statute places the legal incidence of the tax
  upon the seller or the purchaner.  If the tax is placed on the seller,
  he is legally liable for payment of the tax.  The increased costs to
  him of selling his product can he passed on to kne Federal Government,
  as purchaser.  Even though the tax is separately listed, the amount
  of the tax can be viewed as part of the price of the goods or services.

       On the other hand, if the statute requires that the tax be collected
  from the purchaser, then the legal incidence of the tax falls upon the
  Federal Government as consumer.  Because payment of the tax is required
  of the Federal Government by law in those instances, the tax imposes
  an unconstitutional burden on the Feder&'l Government and may not be paid.




  4i


I'


I 1 6


I I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most