About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199132 1 (1980-09-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobactxw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                      UNITED  STATEs GENERAL  ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                                VIASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUN5EL



     B-199132                                   sEp    o   8

     Russel   D.D Hall
     Staff Attorney
     Department  of Human Services     '    '
     Oklahcwma Public Welfare Commission                     Pqblt4 r¶   e
     P.O. [ox  25352
     Oklahcvna City, Oklahoma  73125

     Dear Mr. Hall;

          This  is in resp.onse to your letter of May 27, 1980 in which you
     raise  two issues.  The first concerns whether  income received from
     vending  machines operated on government property  by Government employee
     associations must  be deposited in the Treasury,  pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
     5 484  (1976).  The second concerns the General  Accounting Office's (GAO)
     audit  responsibility under the Randolph-Sheppard  Act, 20 U.S.C. S 107
     (1976).

          Regarding  the first issue, as your letter  correctly points out, the
     Comptroller  General's position on  income from vending machines on Govern-
     ment property  is basically set out in 32 Ccp.  Gen.  124 (1952) and 32
     Comp. Gen.  782 (1952).  In 32 Comp. Gen. 124,  the Attorney General was
     advised  that it was the consistent view of  this Office that funds derived
     from  the installation and operation of vending  machines on Government-
     owned or  -controlled property wore funds  for the use of the United States
     within  thi meaning of that phrase as used  in 31 U.S.C. 5 484 (1976) and,
     as such,  were required to be deposited  into the Treasury as miscellaneous
     receipts  in the absence of express statutory  authority to the contrary.

          However,  in the decision appearing at  32 Comp. Gen. 282, we advised
     the  Posumaster General that we would not object  to the continued use of
     funds  received by employee groups of the Post office  Department frm  the
     operation  of vending machines installed by  them in Government-owned Post
     Office  buildings.  The decision to the Attorney  General was distinguished
     on  thc: basis of the fact that there the Government agency involved, the
     Feder-il Bureau of Investigation, actually  received the proceeds, while
     in  tte Lost Office case the contractual arrangements  for the installment
     purchase,  installation, and operation of  the vending machines at the
     various  Post Offices were made by postal employee  groups, with administra-
     tive  approval, and with the understanding  that any proceeds received by
     the employee  groups from the operation of  the machines could be retained
     by  them.  We stated that:
                                                                     gP

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most