About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

123359 1 (1984-02-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobactfn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                         UNITED SVsp   GEIeRAL ACCUNTING  OFFICE
                                    WSRINGTON,  D.C.

                                 FOR RIEEASE ON DELIVERY
                                        EKPECTE
                                    FEBRUARY 7, 1984

                              STATEMENT OF F. KEVIN BOLAND                       123359
                                SENIOR ASSOCIATE DIRECIOR
                 RESOUCES,  COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
                                       BEFORE THE
                      sUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY CONSEVATION  AND POMER
                            COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND CMRCE
                         UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESATIVES

Chairman and Members of the Subconmittee:

     We appreciate this opportunity to discuss the Dopartment of Energy's (D0E) Elec-
tricity Policy Project (Project).  The Project- report The Future of Electric Power in
kAricat   Economic Supply for sconomic Growth has received considerable attention most
notably because of its conclusion that the industry needs to build substantial amounts
of new large generating capacity at a time when existing reserve margins are high and
grw    in demand for electricity is relatively low.

     Ebrecasting the need for new electricity resources, especially on a nationwide
ba  is over two decades, has become an increasingly uncertain process. DOE ran 25 cases
of their model to project electric demand through 2000.  The model' s estimated most
li ely electric demand growth rate was 2.49 percent per year.  This result was about
mi    y between DOE's 25 estimates which ranged from 1.10 percent to 3.82 percent
   ually.... Based on revised electricity price estimates, which increased the 2.49 per-
ce t growth rate to 3 percent, DOE then chose the 3 percent rate as the basis for esti-
ma ing needed new capacity resources.  Using this higher growth rate led to DOE's fore-
   t being over 80,000 megawatts higher than originally estimated by their rdel's most
li ely case.

     OE's  estimate of available generating capacity by 2000 assumes utility supply
p     are limited to 1991 even though sane plants are currently scheduled tr  commercial
   ration after 1991.  DOE considered but did not include nonconventional supply strate-
gi s such as cogeneration and load management in their supply estimate.  This has the
effect of further increasing their projection of needed new central-station generating
     ity.

     National forecasts of electricity supply and demand have scue severe limitations
   ardless of the specific estimates.  Significant regional variations exist not only in
ttje current level and composition of electric demand and supply, but also it factors
affecting future demand and specific supply alternatives available to reliably and econ-
agically meet that demand.  By not accounting for such variations or by generalizing
c  clusiords based on limited regional applicability, DOE's forecast of needed new gener-
a ing capacity cannot be readily applied to specific regions.

     DOE made extensive use of contractors during the Project to increase its analytical
  pability and obtain views of other groups while meeting their expected one year com-
p etion target.  Almost $2.7 million of the $3 million spent on the Project by DOE was
t  support 27 reports through 15 contracts and subcontracts.  DOE used a va iety of con-
  acting arrangements and awarded 5 contracts on a sole source basis.  DOE   lied exten-
s vely on a contracting procedure known as task order contracts, under whic  20 reports
  re produced.  As we have previously reported, DOE' s use of sole source an task order
c  tracts limits ccmpetition and may not assure that quality products are   tained at
    least cost.  DoE used these type of contracts because of the one year    get date
f r the study.  According to DOE program officials, their experience in a   ding con-
  acts under the competitive process has taken about 12 to 18 months.  Re   red conflict
d d not contain the data needed to determine whether the assessment had bee, completed.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most