About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202655 1 (1981-11-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacsrh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                          UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                                   WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

           B-202655                  November  3, 1981



           Mr. Larry Carton
           3004 Old Court Foad
           Baltimore, Maryland 21208          not make a         to pibli.c reading

           Dear Mr. Carton:

                We are in receipt of your letter asking the General Accounting
           Office to investigate whether legal requirements were met by the
           Social Security Administration in implementing section 209(o) of
           the Social Security Act (codified at I.R.C. § 3121(a)).  Your
           specific concern is that in response to an I.R.S. Ruling concerning
           interpretation of this section, the Administration chose to revise
           its claims manual to reflect the new interpretation of the section
           rather than first amend its regulations on the subject.  You had
           offered the latter alternative as an employee suggestion.

                Based on your description of the situation, we have no cause
           to investigate further the proposed amendments.  The manner in which
           this new policy is being pursued is neither prima facie illegal nor
           outside the realm of reasonable administrative practice.  The Adminis-
           tration has indicated its intention to amend its regulations to
           eliminate any discrepancies between its internal instructions and its
           regulations.  Insofar as your suggestion was not adopted and/or that
           you were not rewarded for it through the employee suggestion program,
           we note that your agency has determined that.you raise questions out-
           side the normal suggestion system and that they relate more to your
           normal job responsibilities.  On the facts you have given us, this
           determination appears reasonable.  However, even if we were to dis-
           agree, we have no authority to compel the adoption of your suggestion
           and we would not involve this Office in what is strictly and internal
           judgment as to the merits and value of a suggestion.

                We regret that we are unable to assist you in this matter,

                                       Sincerely yours,




                                       Fobert H. Hunter,
                                       Assistant General Counsel

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most