About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HEHS-95-197R 1 (1995-08-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobackxe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



   M   )0    United States
(3    O      General Accounting Office
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Health, Education and Human Services Division


             B-257440

             August 11, 1995

             The Honorable George Miller
             House of Representatives

             Dear Mr. Miller:

             As you know, when children do not receive proper care,
             states may remove them from their homes and place them in
             foster care. If the children are from low-income families,
             the federal government generally shares with the state the
             cost of foster care. States are responsible for ensuring
             that (1) the foster care homes or facilities receiving
             these children, whether within the state or out of state,
             protect the children and promote their growth and
             development and (2) claims for federal reimbursement of
             foster care expenses meet federal requirements.

             This letter responds to your concern that the State of
             California may be inappropriately placing children in four
             out-of-state group homes--Arizona Boys Ranch, Glen Mills,
             Rite of Passage, and VisionQuest. You have questioned
             whether these group homes hold for-profit status or operate
             primarily for the detention of children, in which case
             placements in these facilities would be ineligible for
             federal reimbursement.

             Under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980
             (P.L. 96-272), to qualify for federal foster care
             reimbursement, placements must be in nonprofit facilities
             that operate for purposes other than the detention of
             children. This federal reimbursement is to be used solely
             for the foster care of children and not simply to detain
             youths in need of secure custody. On the basis of your
             concerns, our letter addresses the following questions:

                  Why did some group homes serving California foster
                  youths convert to nonprofit status?

                  Did any of the four group homes meet the federal
                  definition of a detention facility?

                  Were any inappropriate federal reimbursements claimed
                  for California youths placed in the four group homes?


                  GAO/HEHS-95-197R Federal Reimbursement for Foster Care

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most