About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HEHS-95-79R 1 (1995-02-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacktb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



(3    O       United States
   GAf        General Accounting Office
              Washington, D.C. 20548

              Health, Education and Human Services Division

              B-256214


              February 14, 1995

              The Honorable Nancy Kassebaum
              Chairman, Committee on Labor
              and Human Resources
              United States Senate

              The Honorable Hank Brown
              United States Senate


              The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic has become
              one of the most serious health threats to the American
              public. The HIV infection rate is estimated to be as high
              as 1 in every 250 persons nationwide. Metropolitan areas
              are especially affected by HIV with rates as high as 1 in
              25. By June 1994, over 400,000 people with HIV had been
              reported to have progressed to acquired immunodeficiency
              syndrome (AIDS), and more than 240,000 had been reported to
              have died of the disease.

              Recognizing the need for additional resources for medical
              and support services for people with AIDS and HIV, the
              Congress enacted the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS
              Resources Emergency (CARE) Act of 1990. In fiscal year
              1994, a total of over $500 million in title I and title II
              funds were distributed to eligible metropolitan areas
              (EMAs) and states. Citing examples of disparities in per
              case funding, you expressed concerns that the existing
              funding formulas for titles I and II of the CARE Act may
              not result in the most equitable distribution of funds to
              states and EMAs.

              At your request, we are finalizing our analysis of which
              factors, if any, inhibit the title I and II funding
              formulas from achieving greater equity. To accomplish this
              task, we relied upon equity criteria that we have developed
              over time and that have been recognized as reasonable
              standards of equity. These equity criteria reflect
              comparative needs among states and EMAs, as measured by the
              size of their caseloads, their per case cost of providing
              health care services, and their capacity to fund services
              from their own resources. We also identified formula
              changes that could improve equity.


                           GAO/HEHS-95-79R Ryan White Funding Formulas

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most