About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

RCED-95-54R 1 (1994-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobackrw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




GAO          United States
             General Accounting Office
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Resources, Community, and
             Economic Development Division

             B-259174


             November 15, 1994


             The Honorable Jack Brooks
             Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary
             House of Representatives

             Dear Mr. Chairman:

             This letter responds to your request concerning various
             matters relating to the use of electronic surveillance
             equipment on general aviation aircraft to assist in the
             interdiction of individuals suspected of smuggling drugs.
             Specifically, you asked us to (1) determine whether certain
             federal law enforcement agencies were surreptitiously
             installing such devices to investigate individuals
             suspected of using aircraft to smuggle drugs, (2)
             substantiate allegations you had received that the law
             enforcement agencies used technicians that were not
             approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
             install and remove the devices, and (3) determine the
             disposition of the aircraft on which the equipment was
             installed.

             In summary, we found that between January 1991 and December
             1993, the Department of Justice, including the Federal
             Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement
             Administration (DEA), and the U.S. Customs Service were
             involved in 62 cases involving electronic surveillance
             devices on 85 general aviation aircraft. On the basis of
             information we obtained from Justice and Customs, 41
             devices were installed under a court order, 17 with the
             consent of the aircraft's owners, and 27 on government-
             controlled aircraft.' We could not substantiate the
             allegations that the technicians who installed the devices
             were not approved by FAA. In fact, Customs provided us



             'Government-controlled aircraft are owned or in the custody
             of law enforcement agencies at the time the device was
             installed. The law enforcement agencies may have obtained
             the aircraft through a forfeiture, purchase, or lease.

                                        GAOIRCED-95-54R, Electronic Surveillance

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most