About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-12-514R 1 (2012-04-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacfzk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




           GAO
         Accounftability * Integrity - Reliability
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


           April 25, 2012


           The Honorable Frank R. Wolf
           Chairman
           Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice,
           Science, and Related Agencies
           Committee on Appropriations
           House of Representatives

           Subject: Patent and Trademark Office: New User Fee Design Presents Opportunities to
           Build on Transparency and Communication Success

           Dear Mr. Chairman:

           This report formally transmits the briefing we gave on January 23, 2012 on the U.S. Patent
           and Trademark Office's (USPTO) user fee design (see enc. I), as well as subsequent
           comments from USPTO (see enc. Ill). Some updates were made to this briefing after it was
           initially delivered to USPTO officials. This letter presents a summary overview; the slides
           present our work and findings more completely.


           The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), enacted in September 2011, significantly
           broadened USPTO's authority to design and set its user fees.1 Our objective was to analyze
           how aspects of USPTO's proposed user fee design may address challenges facing USPTO
           and stakeholders. We began this work under the authority of the Comptroller General in the
           context of questions raised over time by USPTO's appropriations and authorizing
           committees on the USPTO reauthorization debate, including how USPTO's fee design
           affected both its operations and oversight. Subsequently, you expressed interest in our
           analysis and asked that this work be addressed to you.


           We focused on patent fees and processes, and excluded trademark fees and processes,
           because patent fees represent almost all of USPTO fee collections. Given the authority to
           set or adjust patent fees newly granted to USPTO in the AIA, we assessed how USPTO
           fees are set, used, and reviewed using our Federal User Fees: A Design Guide.2 We
           reported on issues related to USPTO fee collections in a previous report.3 For more
           information on our objectives, scope, and methodology, see enclosure I1. In addition to this
           briefing, USPTO officials requested and received information from us on effective
           stakeholder communication in October 2011.


           1Pub. L. No. 112-29.
           2See GAO, Federal User Fees: A Design Guide, GAO-08-386SP (Washington, D.C.: May 29, 2008).
           3See GAO, Budget Issues: Electronic Processing of Non-IRS Collections Has Increased but Better
           Understanding of Cost Structure Is Needed, GAO-10-11 (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 20, 2009).


GAO-12-514R Patent and Trademark Office

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most