About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-12-228R 1 (2011-12-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacfpw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




           GAO
           Acona ity * Integrity * Reliability
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548




           December 8, 2011


           The Honorable John P. Kline
           Chairman
           Committee on Education and the Workforce
           House of Representatives

           The Honorable Martha Roby
           House of Representatives


           Subject: Race to the Top: Characteristics of Grantees' Amended Programs and Education's
           Review Process

           The U.S. Department of Education (Education) established the Race to the Top (RTT) grant
           fund to encourage states to support school reform efforts. In 2010, Education awarded 12
           RTT grants totaling nearly $4 billion, making RTT the largest competitive grant fund ever
           administered by Education. Individual grantee awards ranged from $75 million to
           approximately $700 million.1 The size of each grantee's award was based in part on its
           population, among other factors, and each grantee has 4 years to use grant funds. We
           recently reported on grantees' plans to implement a variety of school reform efforts and how
           Education has provided extensive support to states.2 Our report also discussed
           implementation challenges with RTT. Specifically, we reported that grantees have had
           difficulty finding and hiring qualified personnel to run their grant-funded activities, have
           encountered difficulty complying with state procedures for awarding contracts, and that
           Education took more time than anticipated to review grantees' RTT implementation plans.
           Moreover, the 12 RTT grantees requested amendments to their approved proposals. In an
           effort to ensure that states are held accountable for the terms of their awards, you asked us
           to provide information on the following questions:

           (1) What amendments have grantees requested to their RTT plans, and what reasons have
           grantees given for their amendment requests, particularly those that significantly changed
           projects, project timelines, or budgets?

           (2) What process has Education established to review and approve grantees' requests for
           amendments to their RTT plans?


           1 Grantees included Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland,
           Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Tennessee.
           2 GAO, Race to the Top: Reform Efforts Are Under Way and Information Sharing Could Be Improved,
           GAO-11-658 (Washington, D.C.: June 30, 2011).


GAO-1 2-228R

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most