About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

NSIAD-85-3 1 (1984-10-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabnnv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                              WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548

                                  ' . . .. . ....OCTOBER   30. 1984
  NATIONAL SECURITY AND
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION

       B-215969       RELEASEDIlMII IIII


       The Honorable Ed Bethune                                  125707
       house of Representatives

            Subject: Reporting on Chemical Testing of the Bigeye
                      Binary Chemical Bomb
                      (GAO/NSIAD-85-3)

       Dear Mr. Bethune:

            In your letters of October 4, 17, and 20, 1983, you
       requested information on whether the Department of Defense (DOD)
       had intentionally withheld information from the Congress on the
       Bigeye binary chemical bomb's test failures, primarily through-
       out calendar year 1982 and the first 4 months of calendar year
       1983. Subsequently, we discussed our findings and conclusions
       at several meetings with you and your staff. Details of our
       review are included as enclosure I.

            On June 6, 1984, you asked us to give you a written report
       on our findings and to include information on why congressional
       critics of the system had not been made aware of a January 1984
       test failure involving the bomb's impulse cartridge until just
       before the May 1984 debate in the House on the fiscal year 1985
       Defense Authorization Act. Also, you asked that we include our
       evaluation of DOD's fiscal year 1985 budget request for binary
       chemical weapons.

            In accordance with your October requests, our report
       discusses testing of the Bigeye since the program was restarted
       in 1976. After the program resumed through 1981, there were
       eight chemical tests to update earlier program tests on the
       chemicals. In December 1981, the Secretary of Defense directed
       that the program be accelerated so that production could start
       in fiscal year 1984. As a result there were several tests in
       1982.

            We focused primarily on the events surrounding an October
       1982 test failure which later necessitated a restructuring of
       the program. The test failure resulted from a chemical reaction
       which involved a rapid increase in temperature and pressure to
       such an extreme that an inner section of the bomb was forced out
       the rear of the weapon.


(393006)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most