About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

RCED-84-115 1 (1984-09-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabnlu0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                                                                          Ny

                    UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
         %                     WASHINGTON, D.C. 20648


 RESOURCES, COMMUNITY,                              SEPTEMBER 7, 1984
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
     DIVISION
       B-21 5872

       The Honorable William V. Roth, Jr.
       Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs
       United States Senate                                     125082

       The Honorable Christopher J. Dodd
       United States Senate

            Subject: Information on the Purchase of a Gas Generator
                      Engine for a U.S. Coast Guard Cutter
                      (GAO/RCED-84-115)

            This is in further response to your letters of April 4 and
       18, 1984, concerning the Coast Guard's procurement of a rebuilt
       gas generator engine. In our May 30, 1984, letter to you we
       stated that our audit staff would review the procurement action
       and report to you on the results of that review. This report
       responds to that matter.

            In January 1983, the contractor, Energy Maintenance
       Corporation (EMC), delivered a rebuilt gas generator engine to the
       Coast Guard's District Office in Seattle, Washington for use in
       the Cutter Boutwell at a cost of $388,000. Although EMC's offer
       was considere -responsive, the Coast Guard subsequently decided
       the engine was unusable because it contained disks1 which had
       been previously used in aircraft engines. The agency made this
       decision because the original engine manufacturer strongly
       recommended that disks previously used in aircraft engines not be
       used in marine engines because the disks could fail and cause an
       explosion or fire resulting in serious damage to the ship and
       injury to its crew.

            According to the Coast Guard's General Counsel, the agency
       had no recourse with EMC because the purchase specifications did
       not prohibit the use of disks previously operated in aircraft
       engines. Coast Guard officials told us that organizational
       changes in its procurement process resulted in the issuance of
       inadequate specificiations to purchase the engine. These offi-
       cials told us that the agency has subsequently developed standard
       specifications to repair its gas generator engines rather than
       purchase rebuilt ones. These specifications preclude the use of
       disks previously used in aircraft engines, and according to the


       IHigh-speed rotating elements within the engine to which are
       attached air compressor blades.


(344404)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most