About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

NSIAD-83-70 1 (1983-09-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabndi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                       UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548


  NATIONAL SECURITY ANO
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION
                                                    3 0 SEP 1983
    B-206570


    The Honorable Joseph P. Addabbo
    Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
    Committee on Appropriations
    House of Representatives                               122556

    The Honorable Ted Stevens
    Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
    Committee on Appropriations
    United States Senate

         Subject: Analysis of Multiyear Procurement Candidates
                    Included in Defense's Fiscal Year 1984 Budget
                    Request (GAO/NSIAD-83-70)

         In response to your request we have analyzed fiscal years
    1983 and 1984 multiyear procurement candidates included in the
    Department of Defense fiscal year 1984 budget request. We
    presented our preliminary views in testimony before the
    Subcommittee on Defense, House Committee on Appropriations, on
    June 9, 1983.

         We have, for many years, supported the concept of multiyear
    contracting but believe that savings must be substantial and
    sufficient to offset any added risks to the government. During
    our review we focused on the estimated savings to be achieved
    from each of the 22 candidates, the degree of confidence in the
    cost estimates, and possible risks of multiyear contracting--
    instability in the program, funding, and design. In our opinion,
    only one of the proposed candidates fully met all of the
    legislated criteria for multiyear contracting as of June 1983.

         Defense's estimated savings for its proposed multiyear
    candidates are disappointing when compared to its 10-20 percent
    savings projections when P.L. 97-86 was under consideration. On
    the average, discounted savings for the 22 candidates is about
    7.3 percent. We found many instances of inadequate and tentative
    cost estimates, instability in requirements and equipment design,
    and insufficient assurance that funding would be stable. Also,
    Defense did not rank the candidate programs against all other
    programs in terms of military need. Accordingly, we believe many
    of the candidates were submitted prematurely.

                                                       (942257)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most