About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HRD-83-19 1 (1983-03-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabmxm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



  5UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


HUMAN RESOURCES RESTRt to be released OUtsde th
                bCOtl     -      to   e  e       • .       MARCH 18, 1983

     B-209515                              0,geina ___


     The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch           RELEASED
     Chairman, Committee on Labor
       and Human Resources
     United States Senate
     Dear Mr. Chairman:                                       121133

          Subject: Review of the Upward Bound Program
                    (GAO/HRD-83-19)

          In your February 20, 1981, letter, you requested that we
     review the Department of Education's (ED's) Special Programs for
     Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds--commonly known as the
     TRIO programs. We have reviewed the administration of two TRIO
     programs (Upward Bound and Special Services for Disadvantaged
     Students). This report concerns Upward Bound; a separate report
     on the Special Services program has previously been provided to
     you.1 Upward Bound is a discretionary grant program which pro-
     vides funds to eligible grantees--usually colleges and
     universities--for projects which seek to develop, in participat-
     ing high school students, the motivation and skills necessary
     for success in postsecondary education.

         Although Upward Bound has been in operation since the sum-
     mer of 1965, it is unclear whether the program is achieving its
     intended purpose of generating in disadvantaged youths the
     skills and motivation necessary for success in postsecondary
     education. At the 12 Upward Bound projects we visited, about 50
     percent of the participants who entered the program dropped out
     before graduating from high school. For the students who re-
     mained in the program and graduated from high school, 10 of the
     12 projects either did not properly measure the academic im-
     provements made in the participants' skills levels or did not
     adequately report to ED the academic skills obtained. Also, the
     projects we visited generally did not assess the postsecondary
     performance of participants. Because of the lack of data on
     academic skills and postsecondary performance, neither ED nor
     the projects know whether all of the program's goals are being
     achieved.

     lDepartment of Education Uncertain About Effectiveness of Its
     Special Services Program (GAO/HRD-83-13, Nov. 12, 1982).


(104513)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most