About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

RCED-83-84 1 (1983-01-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabmuo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                  UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

                             WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548


AEgOURCSU COWiUNITY,
VCONOMC VULOPMNt                      January 13, 1983

     B-199244


     The Honorable James J. Howard

     House of Representatives

     Dear Mr. Howard:

          Subject: Comments on Options To Reorganize the General
                   Public Utilities Corporation (GAO/RCED-83-84)

          Your September 1, 1982. letter requested that we comment on
     several questions related to (1) helping reduce the financial
     burden on the ratepayers of the accident at Three Mile Island
     (TMI) and (2) rebuilding a sound financial base for its owners.
     In accordance with agreements reached with your office, we are
     providing a written summary of the information we developed.
     This letter summarizes the answers to your questions. Your
     specific questions and our detailed responses are provided in
     enclosure I.

          As agreed with you, we reviewed information previously devel-
     oped by GAO and other organizations that have studied the issues
     at TMI. We also interviewed and obtained information from a wide
     cross section of ind4'iduals involved with TMI. They include
     representatives from the Securities and Exchange Commission
     (SEC); the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); the Federal Energy
     Regulatory Commission (FERC); the Edison Electric Institute; the
     State utility commissions in New Jersey and Penrsylvania; the
     Governor's office in Pennsylvania; the General Public Utilities
     Corporation (GPU) which owns TMI; and various members of the finan-
     cial community, including investment bankers and specialists in
     electric utility financing. We also attended a public hearing
     conducted by NRC on November 9, 1982, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
     regarding the restart of THI-1. Our review was done in accordance
     with oenerally accepted government audit standards.

          Your first questions inquired about the viability of reorga-
     nizing GPU, either by a public takeover or through a diverstiture.
     The individuals we interviewed generally agreed that the reorganiza-
     tion options offered are not viable because they would not expedite
     the cleanup process, reduce the impact of the accident on consumers


(309353)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most