HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobabmkr0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
DOCUBENT RESUME
01156 - [A0590962] (Restricted)
(Allegations Made by Contractors Concerning Activities of
Employees of Defense Contract Administration Services].
8-184112. January 13, 1977. 5 pp.
Report to Rep. Joseph P. Addabbo, Chairmaij, House Committee on
Small Business: SBA Oversi,'ht and Minority Ente' frise
Subcommittee; Rep. James '. Ccrman, Chairman, House Committee on
Small Business: Governeat Procurement and Intrrnational Traie
Subcommittee; by Elmer B. E:taats, Comptroller G:neral.
Issue Area: Federal Procurement of Goods and Services (1 00).
Contact: Procurement and Systems Acquisition Div.
Budget Function: National Defense: Department of Defense -
Procurement & Contracts (058).
Organization Concerned: Defense Supply Agency: Defense Contract
Administration Services.
Congressional Relevance: House Committee on Small Psiness: 3BA
Oversight and Minority Enterprise Subconnitt-o; House
Committee on Small Business: Government Procurement and
International Trade Subccmittee.
Authority: Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act.
Three allegations made by contractors concerning the
activities of ertain employees of the New York Region of the
Defense Contract Administration Services were reviewed: (1)
service employees were misstating and omitting facts in official
reports; (2) service emp'oyees were harassing contractors who
had publicly stated theii views concerning Services operations;
and (3) a Service employe: instructed subordinates to put
several contractors out of business. Findings/Conclusions:
services employees did omit or misstate certain information in
preaward survey reports, but no-award recommendations did not
result from these misstatements or omissions. No evidence was
found of harassment of contractors. The statement concerning
putting contractors out of business was made, but there was no
evidence of intent to carry out the threat. The employee in
question has been admonished. (RRS)](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobabmkr0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)